
The
Importance of the Upper Arm
By Steven
Robinson
The upper arm is the other half
of the front assembly that has been all to often overlooked. It is one of the
most misunderstood and ignored parts of canine structure. Among many novices and
veterans alike, the importance of the upper arm’s position and length is not a
consideration. Much attention is directed toward the importance of the length
and position of the shoulder blade, but to our canine’s detriment, the upper
arm has become the forgotten half of the front assembly. I believe the primary
reason for this is not having a clear understanding of its function. The purpose
of this article is to provide an understanding of its function and to point out
the advantages to giving this area of the front assembly its due consideration.
Where the position and length of the shoulder blade effects the direction the
force generated from the rear assembly is applied, the length and position of
the upper arm effects the reach, support, and shock absorption capabilities of
the front. Let us begin by looking at the front assembly. Diagram
(1)
This is a working diagram, diagram (1), of a correct balanced front
assembly. As required by our breed standard, the upper arm and shoulder blade
are of the same length. Notice the change in the illustrated position of the
upper arm at rest (Center) and when it is at maximum reach (left). If you placed
an imaginary horizontal line through the point where the upper arm and shoulder
blade attach, the changing positions of the upper arm could be gauged. At rest,
the upper arm would be positioned approximately 45 degrees below this horizontal
line. At maximum reach, the upper arm becomes nearly vertical. Because the upper
arm does not extend much past its vertical position at maximum reach, it has
caused some breeders to erroneously conclude that the upper arm does not affect
forward reach. This is clearly not the case and will be demonstrated later.
Before we concentrate our focus to that of the upper arm, let us take a look at
the big picture. There are three negative impediments to movement that a dog is
constantly battling. The first two are inertia and friction. The third is
gravity. Inertia and friction are the two that resist a dog’s efforts to move.
Inertia is encountered when the dog initiates movement and when there is a
change in speed. Friction occurs with every step when each paw contacts the
ground and from the displacement of air as a dog’s body moves through it.
These two impediments to movement are directional. Their efforts are always
directed against the direction of travel. In order for movement to occur, the
dog needs to supply enough energy in the direction of travel to overcome the
resistance inertia and friction creates. Gravity is a force that our dogs’ are
constantly battling whether moving or standing. It too is directional in its’
effect, and a dog needs to provide constant sufficient energy downward in order
to remain standing or moving. It is very important to fully understand the
impact these obstacles to movement make, and the directions they effect. When
looking at diagram (2, 3, 4 and 5), the horizontal line, defined
by the 0 and the 180-degree marks on each end, represents the line that inertia
and friction resists movement on. Depending on whether a dog is moving forward
or backing up, the direction of resistance changes to oppose the movement. The
vertical line, defined by the 90 and the 270 degree marks on each end, is the
line gravity resists support on. Unlike inertia and friction, gravity’s effect
is always downward. These two directional impediments to movement intersect to
form a 90-degree angle as defined at point (C). Since a 45-degree angle
perfectly bisects the 90-degree angle formed where these two lines meet, it is
often the angle recommended for the shoulder layback because it equally divides
the energy generated by the rear assembly. This equally directs the energy
toward the support and forward movement functions of the front.
In determining the importance of the upper arm, it is the amount of energy the
upper arm directs toward the forward movement and the support functions of the
front that matters most.
Diagram
(2)
Diagram
(3)
In diagram (3), a modified version of diagram (2) has been superimposed upon the
front assembly to make explaining more visually understood. The blue line
segment, from point (C) to point (A), represents the position of the correct
upper arm at rest. The line segment, from Point (C) to point (E), represent the position of the correct upper arm when fully
extended. Point (A)
represents the center of the elbow when the dog is at rest. Point (E)
represents where the elbow ends up
when the upper arm is fully extended. The black curved segment, from Point (A)
to point (E),
represents the path the elbow takes from rest to full extention. The orange
segment, from point (D) to point (A), represents
the distance the upper arm effects forward motion or reach. The green segment,
from point (D) to point (E),
represents the upper arms effect in the support of the front. In other words,
this segment measures the kinetic energy directed downward in the fronts
constant battle against gravity.
As you can see, diagram (3) is not an
exact fit. The differences are simply the result of the shoulder blade being
tilting up and forward when extended. Since we are only concerned with the
function of the upper arm, the shoulder blade’s effect has been negated. Diagram
(4)
Diagram (5)
In the diagrams (4 and 5), two upper arms of different lengths are
depicted. Diagram (4) shows the effectiveness of an upper arm of correct
length. Diagram (5) shows the effectiveness of an upper arm with a 20%
decrease in length. By comparing the effects of the long and short upper arms
depicted in the diagrams, it dramatically demonstrates how subtle differences in
upper arm lengths, have a huge impact on the effectiveness of the front’s
support and forward movement functions. Diagram (6)
Just
a 20% decrease in the length of the upper arm, reduces the upper arm’s effect
toward forward movement by 50% and it also reduces the upper arm’s effect
toward support by 72%. The difference in the lengths of the orange segment, from
point
(D)
to point (A),
depicted
in the diagrams, clearly demonstrates the negative impact a shorter upper arm
has on forward movement. Also, the difference in the length of the green line
segment, from point
(D)
to
point
(E),
depicted in the diagrams, shows how much the shorter upper arm negatively
impacts the support function. In diagram
(6),
the effects of the long and shorter upper arm are compared.
Another very useful task the upper arm performs is being our dog’s main shock
absorber. When a dog jumps, the front paws are the first to hit the ground. The
upper arm absorbs the main jolt of this impact as the elbow travels backwards.
An analogy to this would be a shock absorber on a car. An important aspect to
some shock absorbers is their stroke length. In other words, what is the
distance it can be compressed before it bottoms out? The same thing holds true
for the upper arm. The longer the path is that the elbow travels, the greater
its length to be compressed. The capacity to absorb shock is greater for the
upper arm depicted in diagram (4) because the elbow can be compressed
further before it bottoms out. For a working breed, which is required to jump
and go over walls, shock absorption is very important. This is especially true
for a heavy breed like ours. The shock absorption qualities of the upper arm may
well determine the utility life span of many of our Rottweilers, and it may
explain why some dogs break down in the front. From the epidemic of short upper arms that plague our breed today, it is apparent that the upper arm’s important functions are not being addressed. It is very clear that the upper arm plays a large role in the effectiveness of the front assembly. Since subtle changes in the length of the upper arm have large implications on the front’s ability to function, it is important that the upper arm and the shoulder blade are given equal consideration. |
**NOT FOR REPRINT WITHOUT AUTHORS CONSENT**
1999
to Present - Darkstarr Rottweilers.
Darkstarr Rottweilers is ™ 1999. All Rights Reserved And
Vigorously Protected. Designed and maintained by -
Theresa Robinson-DKStarr